Peer-Reviewed Open Access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Home Issues Volume 1 · Issue 1 Article V1-I1-J-2026-0002
🔬 Original Research 🔓 Open Access ✓ Peer-Reviewed Vol. 1 · Issue 1 · Jul 2026 · Pages

Sectoral Analysis of Csr Spending and Its Influence on Profitability: a Comparative Study of It, Pharma, and Automobile Industries in India

DA
Dr. Kavit Anjaria
J G University·
13
Downloads
21
Views
📄

Abstract

Abstract:

This study looks at how CSR spending differs across the IT, Pharmaceutical, and Automobile industries in India, and how it affects company profitability. The research is based on 15 large-cap companies (5 from each sector) and examines their CSR spending along with key financial measures like ROA, ROE, and Net Profit Margin. By using comparative analysis and ANOVA, the study finds that there are clear differences in both CSR spending and profitability across these sectors. The IT industry shows more consistent CSR investment and stable financial performance, while the Pharmaceutical and Automobile sectors show more variation in both CSR spending and profitability. The results suggest that the impact of CSR is not the same in every industry it depends on factors such as industry nature, regulations, and size of operations. Overall, the study helps managers and policymakers understand how to design better CSR strategies that can improve financial performance while also supporting sustainable development.

🏷️

Keywords

📖

Full Article

🖼️

Figures & Tables

JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_01

TABLE 1. Industry-Wise Variation in CSR Spending and Unspent CSR Amounts — IT Companies (₹ Cr. / % of profit)

PNG
TABLE 1. Industry-Wise Variation in CSR Spending and Unspent CSR Amounts — IT Companies (₹ Cr. / % of profit)

Unspent = unspent CSR amount in ₹ crore; Spent % = CSR spending as a percentage of average net profit. Statutory requirement under Section 135, Companies Act 2013 is 2%. Source: company annual reports and CSR disclosures, FY 2015-16 to FY 2024-25.

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_02

Industry-Wise Variation — Pharma Companies

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_03

Industry-Wise Variation — Auto Companies

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_04

Descriptive Statistics for CSR Spending and Unspent CSR

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_05

ANOVA Result — CSR Spending % and Unspent CSR

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_06

Tukey HSD Post Hoc Test for CSR Unspent Amounts

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_07

Classification Criteria for CSR Compliance Levels

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_09

CSR Compliance Level and Mean ROE

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_10

ANOVA — CSR Compliance and NPM

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_08

CSR Compliance Level and Mean ROA

PNG
JMCBR_J-2026-0002_Table_11

ANOVA — CSR Compliance and ROE

PNG
📚

References

Showing 1 of 1 references · APA 7 format
1

THE FUTURE OF BANKING: HOW NEO BANKS ARE CHANGING THE INDUSTRY.

👥

Author Information

Authors and Affiliations

DA
Dr. Kavit Anjaria ORCID
J G University

Contributions

⚖️

Ethics Declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Users can freely download, share, and reuse the article for any purpose (even commercially), as long as they give proper credit to the original author.

Competing Interests

Users can freely download and share the article, but they are strictly prohibited from using it or selling it for commercial profit.

Consent for Publication

Users can only read and view the article for personal use; they cannot copy, redistribute, or reuse any part of it without explicit permission from your journal.

📋

Editorial Lifecycle

Audit Trail
Complete editorial process — cryptographically verified
📋

Editorial Process Audit Trail

Chain ID: JMCBR-2026-V1-I1-J-2026-0002-CHAIN ✓ Verified · 17 blocks · Genesis 0x9f2b
Submitted Reviewer

Manuscript submitted via online portal

18 Jul 2026 06:43

BLK-001
Plagiarism Check Reviewer

iThenticate Plagiarism Check

18 Jul 2026 06:45

BLK-002
Screening Editors Reviewer

Screening Editors

18 Jul 2026 06:45

BLK-003
With Editor in Chief Editor

Initial editorial screening passed

18 Jul 2026 07:02

BLK-004
Reviewer Invitations Sent Reviewer

Initial reviewer screening passed

18 Jul 2026 07:03

BLK-005
Reviewer Invitations Sent Reviewer

Initial reviewer screening passed

18 Jul 2026 07:03

BLK-006
Under Peer Review Reviewer

Invited & Accepted

18 Jul 2026 07:53

BLK-007
All Reviews Received Reviewer

accept

18 Jul 2026 07:56

BLK-008
Under Peer Review Reviewer

Invited & Accepted

18 Jul 2026 08:01

BLK-009
Reviewer Invitations Sent Reviewer

Initial reviewer screening passed

18 Jul 2026 16:10

BLK-010
All Reviews Received Reviewer

accept

20 Jul 2026 10:12

BLK-011
Accepted Admin

Editor decision: Accepted

20 Jul 2026 10:14

BLK-012
Proof Sent to Author Admin

Manuscript version update!

29 Jul 2026 22:56

BLK-013
Proof Approved Reviewer

Author Approved

30 Jul 2026 19:12

BLK-014
Ready for Production Admin

Manuscript Send to Production Manager!

30 Jul 2026 19:13

BLK-015
Ready for Issue Admin

Manuscript Send to Issue Manager

30 Jul 2026 19:58

BLK-016
Published on the website Admin

Published on the website

30 Jul 2026 19:59

BLK-017
📅 Total editorial timeline: 17 blocks tracked Genesis Hash: 0x9f2b3c7d8e4a5f1b · Verified ✓
🔐

Verification & Trust

Compliant
COPE · ICMJE · FAIR · ORCID · CLOCKSS
🛡️

Article Integrity Verified

All editorial chain blocks cryptographically verified · Compliant with COPE, ICMJE, and FAIR standards

🔗 Chain Integrity
✓ 17 blocks verified
🌳 Genesis Hash (Merkle Root)
0x0000000080ac00ab9c79067667b91b8d1bdfe60c
📝 Plagiarism Screening
14.000% similarity · iThenticate ✓
🤖 AI Content Detection
0.000% probability · AI Detection Tool ✓
👥 Peer Reviewer Verification
1 verified reviewers (sealed)
🆔 ORCID Verification
1/1 authors verified
🔗 Crossref DOI Registration
Pending registration
📦 Preservation Archives
CLOCKSS ✓ Portico ✓
⚖️ Ethics Approval
💼 Conflict of Interest Declaration
🔐 Verification Standards: This article complies with COPE, ICMJE, FAIR data principles, iThenticate plagiarism screening, GPTZero AI content detection, and ORCID author identification. The audit trail is permanently preserved and independently verifiable.
ℹ️

About this article

📝 Cite this article · How to Cite

View all citation formats in sidebar →
Anjaria, K. (2026). Sectoral Analysis of CSR Spending and Its Influence on Profitability: A Comparative Study of IT, Pharma, and Automobile Industries in India. Journal of Management, Commerce & Business Research, 1(1), . https://doi.org/
⬇️ Download citation
📥 Received
18 July 2026
✏️ Revised
✅ Accepted
20 July 2026
📅 Published
30 July 2026
📄 Version of Record
30 July 2026
🔗 DOI
📖 Issue
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July 2026)
📃 Pages
(0 pages)
🔢 Article Number
JMCBR-V1-I1-V1-I1-J-2026-0002
📜 License
CC BY-NC 4.0
🔗

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Provide free access to colleagues, peers, and your professional network — no subscription required for them to view the full article.

Provided by the Datarsoft SharedIt content-sharing initiative.
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙