📄
Abstract
Abstract:
This study looks at how CSR
spending differs across the IT, Pharmaceutical, and Automobile industries in
India, and how it affects company profitability. The research is based on 15
large-cap companies (5 from each sector) and examines their CSR spending along
with key financial measures like ROA, ROE, and Net Profit Margin. By using
comparative analysis and ANOVA, the study finds that there are clear
differences in both CSR spending and profitability across these sectors. The IT
industry shows more consistent CSR investment and stable financial performance,
while the Pharmaceutical and Automobile sectors show more variation in both CSR
spending and profitability. The results suggest that the impact of CSR is not
the same in every industry it depends on factors such as industry nature,
regulations, and size of operations. Overall, the study helps managers and
policymakers understand how to design better CSR strategies that can improve
financial performance while also supporting sustainable development.
🏷️
Keywords
📖
Full Article
🖼️
Figures & Tables

TABLE 1. Industry-Wise Variation in CSR Spending and Unspent CSR Amounts — IT Companies (₹ Cr. / % of profit)

Unspent = unspent CSR amount in ₹ crore; Spent % = CSR spending as a percentage of average net profit. Statutory requirement under Section 135, Companies Act 2013 is 2%. Source: company annual reports and CSR disclosures, FY 2015-16 to FY 2024-25.
📚
References
THE FUTURE OF BANKING: HOW NEO BANKS ARE CHANGING THE INDUSTRY.
⚖️
Ethics Declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Users can freely download, share, and reuse the article for any purpose (even commercially), as long as they give proper credit to the original author.
Competing Interests
Users can freely download and share the article, but they are strictly prohibited from using it or selling it for commercial profit.
Consent for Publication
Users can only read and view the article for personal use; they cannot copy, redistribute, or reuse any part of it without explicit permission from your journal.
📋
Editorial Lifecycle
Audit TrailComplete editorial process — cryptographically verified
Editorial Lifecycle
Audit TrailEditorial Process Audit Trail
JMCBR-2026-V1-I1-J-2026-0002-CHAIN
✓ Verified · 17 blocks · Genesis 0x9f2bManuscript submitted via online portal
18 Jul 2026 06:43
iThenticate Plagiarism Check
18 Jul 2026 06:45
Screening Editors
18 Jul 2026 06:45
Initial editorial screening passed
18 Jul 2026 07:02
Initial reviewer screening passed
18 Jul 2026 07:03
Initial reviewer screening passed
18 Jul 2026 07:03
Invited & Accepted
18 Jul 2026 07:53
accept
18 Jul 2026 07:56
Invited & Accepted
18 Jul 2026 08:01
Initial reviewer screening passed
18 Jul 2026 16:10
accept
20 Jul 2026 10:12
Editor decision: Accepted
20 Jul 2026 10:14
Manuscript version update!
29 Jul 2026 22:56
Author Approved
30 Jul 2026 19:12
Manuscript Send to Production Manager!
30 Jul 2026 19:13
Manuscript Send to Issue Manager
30 Jul 2026 19:58
Published on the website
30 Jul 2026 19:59
🔐
Verification & Trust
CompliantCOPE · ICMJE · FAIR · ORCID · CLOCKSS
Verification & Trust
CompliantArticle Integrity Verified
All editorial chain blocks cryptographically verified · Compliant with COPE, ICMJE, and FAIR standards









